Pulling a De Kort

Posted in New Media, Web 2.0 by Aldo Bello on August 30th, 2006

I wonder if years down the road we’ll refer to this type of act as “pulling a De Kort,” and whether the same might also refer to the subsequent repercussions for both accuser and accused.

Keeping in mind that this new era of transparency is redefining privacy as we know it (both personal and organizational), read the Washington Post article and give us your opinion on how the Coast Guard and Lockheed Martin should respond to the allegations.

Del.icio.us, Digg, Technorati, Furl, Reddit, Spurl

2 Responses to 'Pulling a De Kort'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Pulling a De Kort'.

  1. Wes Alwan said,

    on November 16th, 2006 at 4:13 pm

    Power to the people!

    Lockheed Martin and the Coast Guard would do well to respond by posting their own YouTube video. Seriously.

    On the other hand, simply reacting defensively and attacking the medium generally seem to have been counterproductive strategies for companies subjected to this kind of criticism. As in: “‘Anybody with a webcam and something to say, regardless of whether it’s true or not, can say it on YouTube,’ she said, adding that the company would not ask the site to take the video down.”

    Whatever the authenticity of the engineer’s complaints, LM would do well to explain their position openly and in detail, and not simply claim that their internal (black-box) investigation has settled the matter. Otherwise there’s a chance they’ll be explaining their position before a congressional committee.

  2. Jay Ferrari said,

    on November 16th, 2006 at 4:15 pm

    What a breakthrough: Don’t shoot the messenger. Shoot the medium!

    Since LM doesn’t have the courage to embrace new media and prepare a proper rejoinder, the quickest defense is to dismiss that “newfangled technology”.

    When The House of Seven Gables (arguably the first modern novel) was published in 1851, religious idealists railed against the book — not because of its content, but because the feared the youth of America would squander precious prayer time and instead sit under trees and read.

    Change the year, swap novel with Web, and you’ve wrapped the critique in contemporary clothing. The good news is that today’s hyper-media consumers are increasingly aware of this dodge. LM’s dismissal of the means of message delivery, rather than dealing with the message itself, is tantamount to confession — at least, that’s what will linger (albeit only for an instant) in our minds.

Leave a Reply

Note: Comments will not be visible on this site until approved by a moderator.